HumidiFi Records ~$8.55B Weekly Volume to Dominate Solana DEXs, Hits $600M+ Daily Trades

Summary

Data from DeFiLlama shows that over the past 7 days, HumidiFi, a proprietary AMM (prop AMM, or “dark pool”) on Solana, recorded ~US$8.554 billion in trading volume, surpassing DEXs like Meteora, Raydium, and PumpSwap. In 24-hour metrics, HumidiFi’s daily volume is comparable to ~US$600 million. Its rapid ascent underscores the growing impact of dark pool AMMs, which quote prices privately and operate via aggregators rather than public order books.

Key Metrics & Comparisons

• 7-Day Volume (HumidiFi): $8.554 billion — highest among Solana DEXs listed on DeFiLlama.
• 24-Hour Volume: ~$557.04 million for HumidiFi.
• In the Solana DEX volume ranking, HumidiFi ranks alongside or ahead^J of established AMMs like Meteora and Raydium.
• Traditional AMMs like Raydium and Meteora have lower 24h volumes compared with HumidiFi’s scale.

What Are Prop AMMs / Dark Pools?

• Private Price Quoting: Unlike public AMMs with visible liquidity and pools, prop AMMs quote prices privately. Trades are typically routed⁶ to them via aggregators (e.g. Jupiter), which pick the best price among options.
• Opaque Liquidity: Many prop AMMs do not offer public user interfaces or expose their internal liquidity pools, instead relying on backend integration.
• Efficiency & Execution Advantage: Because they can dynamically manage pricing, detect arbitrage opportunities, and avoid front-running / MEV losses, prop AMMs often offer tighter spreads and more efficient pricing for large orders.

Why HumidiFi’s Surge Matters

1. Market Share Disruption
   HumidiFi’s volume growth challenges the dominance of legacy DEXs like Raydium and Meteora. Its model shows that execution and pricing efficiency can outweigh brand or history.
2. Aggregator Leverage
   Aggregators routing trades to prop AMMs give them de facto access to liquidity without needing public signage. This allows them to compete on pricing more flexibly.
3. Implications for LPs & Token Projects
   As prop AMMs gain share, liquidity providers on traditional AMMs may see reduced volume. Projects may reconsider where they deploy incentives and liquidity.
4. Transparency vs Performance Tradeoff
   While dark pools offer performance benefits, they introduce opacity: users and auditors may find it harder to assess risk, reserves, or the identity of operators.

Caveats & Open Questions

• The $8.554B weekly volume and $557M daily volume figures are drawn from DeFiLlama, which aggregates on-chain swap volumes. These numbers may not account³ for off-chain or luxury routing adjustments.
• The claim in your prompt of $1.917 billion daily volume on September 25 is not corroborated by the data I found; HumidiFi’s 24h volume per DeFiLlama is ~$557M.
• Prop AMMs often operate without public fronts, so tracking or verifying counterparty risk, liquidity backing, or misuse may be harder.
• The dominance of prop AMMs also depends on aggregator strategy: if aggregators favor them, volume shifts can amplify rapidly.

What to Watch Next

• Whether HumidiFi breaks new daily volume records, especially on high-activity days.
• Aggregator behavior: how much routing shifts toward prop AMMs versus traditional AMMs.
• How legacy DEXs respond—will they adopt hybrid⁹ models, interface upgrades, or incentive shifts?
• Transparency initiatives: whether prop AMMs publish audits, reserves, or counterparty disclosures.
• Regulatory or community scrutiny around opacity, fairness, fees, and possibilities of manipulation. (Bonus BTC: MK65NO7U)

41Z5NRB7