Bitcoin whales use in-kind ETF swaps to move ~$3 B into regulated finance via BlackRock

Large Bitcoin holders are increasingly converting their holdings into spot ­Bitcoin ETFs via in-kind creation mechanisms, allowing them to move crypto wealth into traditional⁰ portfolios without triggering a sale. According to Bloomberg, managers such as BlackRock have processed more than US$3 billion in such conversions.

What’s going on

• A regulatory change this summer allowed spot Bitcoin ETFs to accept “in-kind” creations — meaning Bitcoin holders can deposit⁴ actual BTC into an ETF and receive shares, instead of the ETF purchasing Bitcoin with cash.
• BlackRock’s spot Bitcoin ETF (ticker IBIT) has reportedly handled over $3 billion in conversions from large holders via this mechanism.
• The approach enables whales to shift into regulated financial-products wrappers — benefiting from familiar brokerage or wealth-management structures while maintaining Bitcoin exposure.
• Key benefits cited include reduced visible trading impact, potential tax efficiency and easier integration into broader portfolios (e.g., lending, margin, estate planning) under traditional finance (TradFi) frameworks.

Why it matters

• Institutional adoption signal: The ability and willingness of major holders to use ETFs as a vehicle suggests evolving pathways for institutional and ultra-high-net-worth (UHNW) participation in Bitcoin.
• Shift in custody model: Historically, many large Bitcoin holders preferred self-custody (“own your keys”) and OTC trades. The in-kind ETF route represents a shift toward regulated custody/integration models.
• Market structure implications: Converting crypto holdings into an ETF wrapper may influence Bitcoin supply dynamics (less available for spot trading), and create additional linkages between crypto and traditional finance systems (e.g., ETFs, derivatives, lending).
• Tax and regulatory planning: In-kind transfers offer a less visible exit path (in terms of public order-book impact) and may offer more favourable tax or accounting treatment, especially for legacy wealth/higher-net-worth holders.
• Competitive advantage for ETF issuers: Managers such as BlackRock that enable in-kind creations and have existing wealth-management footing may gain a competitive edge in attracting large holders, which may also increase flows/influence for the ETF product itself.

Key players & mechanisms

• BlackRock (IBIT): According to Bloomberg and other outlets, BlackRock has been at the forefront² of facilitating these in-kind conversions for Bitcoin holders.
• Authorized Participants (APs): In-kind creation requires APs to deliver Bitcoin to the ETF issuer in exchange for ETF shares; this mechanism parallels how many equity or bond ETFs function but is newer in the crypto context.
• Wealth management platforms / private banks: Many large Bitcoin holders reportedly prefer to hold their exposure within familiar structures (brokerage/wealth platform) rather than via self-custody wallets; the ETF wrapper enables this.

Risks & considerations

• Less direct control: Moving Bitcoin into an ETF means holders trade some of the direct ownership and control that self-custody provides for the convenience and regulatory integration of the wrapper product.
• Regulatory or structural changes: ETF rules, in-kind creation policies or tax treatments could change; such conversions rely on the continued availability of the mechanism and regulatory consistency.
• Liquidity and redemption risks: If ETF mechanics or underlying Bitcoin flows become stressed, there may be redemption or liquidity risks — though established ETF issuers may mitigate some of those concerns.
• Price impact & signaling: Large conversions may not show up in spot Bitcoin trading volumes (since not sold publicly), but they do shift supply and could⁵ nonetheless influence market dynamics or sentiment.
• Transparency & disclosures: While in-kind conversions may avoid visible spot-sales, transparency and disclosure standards remain important for investors, regulators and market watchers to judge systemic risk.

What to watch next

• Flow data for Bitcoin spot ETFs: Monitor weekly/monthly data for large inflows via in-kind creation and how these correlate with Bitcoin price moves and open interest in derivatives.
• Expansion of in-kind conversion mechanism: Whether in-kind creation becomes more widely available across ETF issuers or extended to other crypto assets (e.g., Ethereum) and regions.
• Institutional behaviour: Are traditional fund⁶ managers, family offices or pension funds increasingly using this route to gain Bitcoin exposure? How broad is adoption beyond “whales”?
• Regulatory responses: Regulatory scrutiny of crypto-ETFs may heighten with this activity; watch for SEC, FINRA, or other regulator statements on in-kind creation transparency, liquidity or systemic risk.
• Impact on Bitcoin ecosystem: Less self-custody, more ETF-wrapped Bitcoin could change the dynamics of wallet holdings, exchange flows, mining/supply side behaviour and decentralisation narratives.

Bottom line

The reported ~US$3 billion of Bitcoin-to-ETF conversions underscores a significant structural evolution: Bitcoin holders are increasingly moving into regulated traditional financial investment vehicles rather than remaining in standalone crypto custody. This marks another step in the integration of crypto with mainstream finance and suggests that for some large holders, the ETF wrapper is now a preferred route. Whether this trend broadens, how it affects Bitcoin’s market dynamics and how regulators respond will be important developments to follow.

63JO2F9D